Monthly Archive for January, 2012

Latest papers in the Social Sciences Journal

social1

Recently published papers in The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences include:

Social Sciences Journal, Volume 6, Issue 4 now available

socialsciences_front1The fourth issue of Volume 6 of The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences has been published.

Volume 6, Issue 4 contains:

Continue reading ‘Social Sciences Journal, Volume 6, Issue 4 now available’

Social Sciences Journal: Recently Published

social1

Recently published papers in The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences include:

Social Sciences Journal, Volume 6, Issue 3 now available

socialsciences_front1The third issue of Volume 6 of The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences has been published.

Volume 6, Issue 3 contains:

Continue reading ‘Social Sciences Journal, Volume 6, Issue 3 now available’

Rethinking “Out of Africa”

By Christopher Stringer via Edge

I’m thinking a lot about species concepts as applied to humans, about the “Out of Africa” model, and also looking back into Africa itself. I think the idea that modern humans originated in Africa is still a sound concept. Behaviorally and physically, we began our story there, but I’ve come around to thinking that it wasn’t a simple origin. Twenty years ago, I would have argued that our species evolved in one place, maybe in East Africa or South Africa. There was a period of time in just one place where a small population of humans became modern, physically and behaviourally. Isolated and perhaps stressed by climate change, this drove a rapid and punctuational origin for our species. Now I don’t think it was that simple, either within or outside of Africa.

[CHRISTOPHER STRINGER:] At the moment, I’m looking again at the whole question of a recent African origin for modern humans—the leading idea over the last 20 years. This argues  that we had a recent African origin, that we came out of Africa, and that we replaced all of the other human forms that were outside of Africa. But we’re having to re-evaluate that now because genetic data suggest that the modern humans who came out of Africa about 60,000 years ago probably interbred with Neanderthals, first of all, and then some of them later on interbred with another group of people called the Denisovans, over in south eastern Asia.

If this is so, then we are not purely of recent African origin. We’re mostly of recent African origin, but there was contact with these other so-called species. We’re having to re-evaluate the Out-of-Africa theory, and we’re having to re-evaluate the species concepts we apply, because in one view of thinking, species should be self-contained units. They don’t interbreed with other species. However, for me, the whole idea of Neanderthals as a different species is really a recognition of their separate evolutionary history—the fact that we can show that they evolved through time in a particular direction, distinct from modern humans, and they separated maybe 400,000 years ago from our lineage. And morphologically we can distinguish a relatively complete Neanderthal fossil from any recent human.  More…


The Idea of Happiness

By Ashis Nandy via Economic & Political Weekly

The idea of happiness has changed. It has emerged as a measurable, autonomous, manageable, psychological variable in the global middle-class culture. The self-conscious, determined search for happiness has gradually transformed the idea of happiness from a mental state to an objectified quality of life that can be attained the way an athlete after training under specialists and going through a strict regimen of exercises and diet wins a medal in a track meet. Might it be that the sense of well-being of a mentally healthy person shows its robustness by being able to live with some amount of unhappiness and what is commonly seen as ill-health?

This is based on the 13th Kappen Memorial Lecture, delivered at Bangalore on 22 September 2011.

It has grown out of a trialogue among Tamotsu Aoki, Nur Yalman, and the author, organised some years ago by Iwanami Shoten at Tokyo. The discussion spilled into a conference on “Culture and Hegemony: Politics of Culture in the Age of Globalisation”, organised by GRIPS project of the University of Tokyo and by the Institut fur Ethnologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universit, Heidelberg, and into a small article published in Spanish in an Yearbook.

Ashis Nandy (reasonbuster@csds.in) is with the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, Delhi.  More…